* If you need a browser feature we don't support yet, you can call to/from Javascript with our FFI - but you can still wrap it up in a Python form and use that from our visual designer. (You can even use our built-in database from uplink code.) * If you need to use code (or hardware) outside our server environment, you can use our Uplink library to connect arbitrary code anywhere in the world to your app - but you still get our drag'n'drop front end and seamless RPC. We call this pattern an 'escape hatch', rather than an 'ejector seat', because you don't need to jump all the way out at once.Īnvil has escape hatches all over the place: Good luck!'Ī much more interesting approach is to acknowledge that your system will always be incomplete, and provide ways of using more complex external features without abandoning simplicity for the other 90% of your project. It says, 'because you needed one advanced feature, I am now dumping you into the Wild West I was previously protecting you from. There should be a way for that sentiment to extend beyond React, into the database world, the IDE world so that we can collaborate and create more nice things like this.Īs a rule, I'm not a fan of the 'Eject button' pattern.

It seems to me that people like Dan Abramov, Brent Jackson, and others are on the same wavelength which is incredibly powerful for the react community. It draws on a lot of great, previous past projects and seems to define the train of thought for other react projects. just getting the product finished and published to users? I don't mean to be cynical but I wish there was some way all these different tools somehow built on each other instead of constantly resetting the dev stacks.įor example, Create React App - I'm constantly impressed by how it has eschewed configuration in favor of getting things done while still having a lot of flexibility. only to spend more time configuring individual components and cobbling them together vs.

How much time now is spent learning the latest and greatest framework/toolkit/etc. Why aren't there more of these things out there? Publishing to the web, even the flow of clicking on a button to edit its handler looks like it was based directly on Winforms which is a 12 year old technology. Things like drop-in provider-based OAuth, editing versioned database projects, WYSIWYG UI, etc. But seeing this now, in 2017, is a bit depressing to me.įor the last 15 years Microsoft has been putting out the same RAD tools, but based on ASP.NET/C#/Visual Studio.

For iphone download ANVIL free